Choosing Your Audiences

As willing as we are to be transparent (those of us who put our lives out online, anyway), we do need to be careful about choosing where we share, and the voice we use to do so. This isn’t just about context, though it could well be – Jon Udell has a concise way of summing up the need for context – but tone, manner. Digital body language at its best.

You don’t develop any social language overnight, and most of it’s impossible to predetermine. As Liz Strauss said on a recent interview with Mitch Joel for the Six Pixels of Separation podcast, there’s a big gap between the actions of an out-of-college enthusiast and a dyed in the wool professional. It’s all well and good to be a digital native who can carry on a phone conversation while texting at five tweets a minute and using acronyms like RSS, CSS, PHP and Social Media. Wait, the last one was a buzzword. Sometimes it’s hard to tell the difference.

This applies to more than just business, it applies to any conversation, venue, network or clique we manage to get ourselves involved in. Sometimes you can recognize when you’re acting differently, or when others are. What’s more difficult is figuring out what informed these people with visibly “better” manners to behave this way in the first place.

Over the next few months, I’m going to try and figure out what habits work best, make sure you piss off the least number of people, and make communicating in some of these channels more effective, efficient and enriching. As much as we’d love to believe “Just Act Human” is a great call to action, it’s just not that simple. I’ve had trouble; I’m betting you have too.

So let’s figure this out together, ok?

Photo by kevindooley

Other Posts You Might Like

No related posts! Nothing quite like this one.

Stay connected!

Ian M Rountree runs on the Genesis Framework

Genesis Framework

The Genesis Framework empowers you to quickly and easily build incredible websites with WordPress. Whether you're a novice or advanced developer, Genesis provides the secure and search-engine-optimized foundation that takes WordPress to places you never thought it could go. It's that simple - start using Genesis now!

Take advantage of the 6 default layout options, comprehensive SEO settings, rock-solid security, flexible theme options, cool custom widgets, custom design hooks, and a huge selection of child themes ("skins") that make your site look the way you want it to. With automatic theme updates and world-class support included, Genesis is the smart choice for your WordPress website or blog.

Check out Genesis now!

  • Pingback: Ian M Rountree

  • http://broadcasting-brain.com Mark Dykeman

    Would you say that a big challenge in a lot of online communication is a lack of physical presence to provide tone, body language, etc.? Or just that it's not appropriate to talk about intercourse in most religious communities, online or off?

    • http://ianmrountree.com Ian M Rountree

      Tough question.

      Physical interpritation is an issue – but we got over the disembodied voice conundrum with the telephone. I think the same development of good etiquette will come in online channels once we get used to it.

      As for intercourse – I'd say topics are easier to choose your audience for than, say, cliches applying to those topics, or mannerisms which might fall down. Like telling someone to google something when speaking at a Microsoft conference. Appropriate topic and mode, wrong venue.

      Ought to be an interesting undertaking.

  • http://broadcasting-brain.com Mark Dykeman

    Would you say that a big challenge in a lot of online communication is a lack of physical presence to provide tone, body language, etc.? Or just that it's not appropriate to talk about intercourse in most religious communities, online or off?

  • http://broadcasting-brain.com Mark Dykeman

    Would you say that a big challenge in a lot of online communication is a lack of physical presence to provide tone, body language, etc.? Or just that it's not appropriate to talk about intercourse in most religious communities, online or off?

  • http://ianmrountree.com Ian M Rountree

    Tough question.

    Physical interpritation is an issue – but we got over the disembodied voice conundrum with the telephone. I think the same development of good etiquette will come in online channels once we get used to it.

    As for intercourse – I'd say topics are easier to choose your audience for than, say, cliches applying to those topics, or mannerisms which might fall down. Like telling someone to google something when speaking at a Microsoft conference. Appropriate topic and mode, wrong venue.

    Ought to be an interesting undertaking.

  • http://ianmrountree.com Ian M Rountree

    Tough question.

    Physical interpritation is an issue – but we got over the disembodied voice conundrum with the telephone. I think the same development of good etiquette will come in online channels once we get used to it.

    As for intercourse – I'd say topics are easier to choose your audience for than, say, cliches applying to those topics, or mannerisms which might fall down. Like telling someone to google something when speaking at a Microsoft conference. Appropriate topic and mode, wrong venue.

    Ought to be an interesting undertaking.

  • Pingback: uberVU - social comments