Ian M Rountree

Copywriter, Project Manager, Digital Marketing

  • Copywriting
    • Content Marketing
    • SEO
  • About
  • Contact

Hack Economics

March 9, 2009 by Ian Leave a Comment

I’m not a real economist. I’ve never been to school for anything other than basic training, and certainly not economics or anything related. I’m a hack economist, like so many others out there. I make up numbers as I go along, and mash theories together in combinations I’m sure strike the professionals worse than marmalade and liverwurst – but that’s beside the point. The trouble with hack economics is the trouble with the financial state of the world.

If I decide to curb my spending because of something I hear on the news, about the economy being down, what does that gain me? My wage stays the same, assuming I don’t lose my job – granted, I work on commission partially, so others not spending harms me in percentage values – and the actual cost of living doesn’t go up unless my situation changes. But if I’m not contributing to the buffer, I’m detracting from it with my scrounging.

Similarly, if I spend more because there are good theoretical deals on things – because people are dipping prices to bust the recession – I’m actually lessening my ability to pay my bills, and thus harming my position in the economy and, by proxy, the economy itself.

And if I do nothing, change no habits and continue the mediocre road I’m not preventing bad situations, nor encouraging good ones. The middle of the road means that, while I maintain equilibrium, save a little, buy a little… I likely don’t do a lot of discretionary buying, other than planned stuff, which means a very boring time. If I’m not attempting to change the course of the world, I cannot possibly help, and make no attempt to stop those who hinder.

So where do we win? What adjustments can be made? Well, for one thing, we can stop paying attention to the news. We can look at our own expenses and incomes evenly, with verve and conservation in mind. We can not go crazy with spending, and refuse to wall ourselves in with worry. This is opinion, I warn you, but if everyone had an attitude of constant, cautious progress, the world would be a lot less exciting… But we’d also have a lot less to worry about. And when it comes to sacrificing excitement in the name of reducing stress… Well, I’m all over that.

Filed Under: Personal Tagged With: archive, economics

One Third of NaNo

November 10, 2008 by Ian Leave a Comment

So we’re pretty much a third of the way through National Novel Writing Month, and I’m at about a third of where I need to be. It’s annoying, but it happens. Writers have this issue – it amounts to the same thing retail workers call “Stockroom Syndrome” where you enter the stock room and completely forget what you were going there for. Sort of the same thing every time I fire up Office and get ready – I open OneNote for all my world notes, Excel for all my plotlining, and Word for my document itself and – BLAM – there goes my next scene. It doesn’t matter how well planned it is, I just completely fail at writing it.

However, I’m on day one of three consecutive days off, so somewhere in that time I hope to get up to the 15k words I’m aiming for by this point, even if I should be closer to 20k or 25k by the end of the week. I’m only just over 6k now. If there are any beta readers still hiding out there, please do let me know by email. You’ve got mine, I assume? Good.

On a completely bump-related note, go on and stop by http://www.khrystallee.com/ and check out her stuff. I had the privilage of talking to Khrystallee about her stuff today, and Jaz has a necklace of hers. It’s some of the best work out there, and incredibly well priced.

Following is a bit of a personal rant, feel free to avoid it.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Personal Tagged With: archive, nanowrimo

2008 Nano!

October 15, 2008 by Ian Leave a Comment

I’ve entered the 2008 National Novel Writing Month contest! Yay me! Also, Lei is helping me with the writing, as my entry is The Dowager Shadow, which is the extension of the Maredran RP game. It starts on November 1st, so there’s still time to prepare. Whee!

Filed Under: Personal Tagged With: archive, nanowrimo

The Clock of the Long Now

July 22, 2008 by Ian Leave a Comment

Thanks to Slashdot [RTFA], I’ve just been introduced to one of the most ambitious projects I’ve ever come across. The Clock of the Long Now, also known as the Millennium Clock, will be a sempiternal machine constructed in Nevada; a clock that ticks once a year, bongs once a century, and whose cuckoo comes out once every thousand years. Danny Hillis, one of the world’s leading computer architects, has spent the last thirteen years envisioning this massive testament to long term thinking and responsability, and I have to say, I’m completely entranced.

Long term planning is nothing new. The Antikythera Mechanism, for one, was designed long before computers and had the task of calculating(very accurately in fact) the exact paths and positions of the local celestial bodies. However, while the mechanism itself withstood enough chronological decay to allow current epoch researchers to piece it back together, it’s unlikely that it was constructed with forethought, and no documentation or preparation seemed evident in its discovery. As Hillis mentions in his essay:

I think of the oak beams in the ceiling of College Hall at New College, Oxford. Last century, when the beams needed replacing, carpenters used oak trees that had been planted in 1386 when the dining hall was first built. The 14th-century builder had planted the trees in anticipation of the time, hundreds of years in the future, when the beams would need replacing. Did the carpenters plant new trees to replace the beams again a few hundred years from now?

Fiction explores this concept often. The Kwisatz Haderach in Frank Herbert’s Dune is a great example. The Babylon 5 series and it’s undercurrents of recursive history is another. Robert Jordan’s Wheel of Time. The Lexx series – the original movies, not their child series that has been recently run. I’m currently writing the beginnings of such a project myself; the Dowager Shadow sequence on Maredran will explore some of the consequences of long-term planning gone wrong.

I think I need to explore this in a little more depth. So I’ve added “Sempiternal” as a category to my posts. It won’t encompass only the Dowager Shadow project, as that’s a purely fictional work. Rather, my intention is to research the ideas behind lasting structures and how they came to be that way; centuries old institutions such as governments and religion, orders and so on. If I’m going to get the Order of Shadow right for Maredran, I need to know what I’m talking about. Similarely, whenever I pegin the Shad Hazar project for Aragos, I’ll need to apply the sane tenets and strictures to the histories of Grimuard and Han Vessa. The Na’ai are a long-lived people, so I’ll need to learn how they think, in terms of planning for centuries-long research projects, decades rather than eyars of intra-disciplinary training and so on.

It’s going to be a long ride.

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: archive

Screw the RIAA? Not Likely.

February 11, 2004 by Ian Leave a Comment

This is a bit of a difficult topic for me, especially being a writer. A lot of time goes into writing a book, planning them and twisting on the plots and characters to make them as real as possible. So much energy – creative and otherwise – goes into the creation of a novel, that it clears up any misconceptions the author may have had before setting pen to paper or finger to keyboard. For someone looking at composing a work of literary mastery, or even a mediocre pulp fiction novel, there are a lot of things to consider. Having considered these things, a lot of people will find they’re hypocrites.

According to Robert J. Sawyer, author of Calculating God and Hybrids, a novelist writing full time must spend roughly ten months from book concept to publishing date – and that’s if you have a deal and an advance. What this means, is that a full time writer, using Sawyer’s formula of 8-pages-a-day, spends between two and fourteen hours each and every day for ten months to a year, to produce a work of fiction. This means between six hundred and four thousand hours of writing time. One would expect, that putting out a hard-cover novel and earning 10% on that book listed at $25-$30 would pay the rent, correct? No, not a chance. Let’s assume that the author recieves a $5000 advance for their novel – which is nowhere near enough to cover a year’s living expenses if they write full time. In order to “earn out” that advance, the book must sell well enough, and even recieving 10% of the list price (at the book store) this novel must sell at least 1500 copies. If the author is recieving 10% on the sale price, and the stores pay $18 for the book, then the novel must sell roughly 3000 copies before the writer sees a penny again.

Five thousand dollars for ten months of heart-wrenching labour? Is it worth it? For a lot of people, it isn’t, and I don’t blame them. New authors have a lot of harrowing trials to go through before they can get a literary agent, much less get signed to a prominent publishing house, and only then do they have a chance of getting published – this is nothing said of their advance being smaller because of lack of interest, or their book doing well. To quote Sawyer again, “writing is the only profession where so solitary work fails or suceeds in such a public forum.” This sort of thought breaks the backs of many writers, causing them to abandon their dreams. Writing is an increasingly popular dream for many people, and an increasingly shallow market for publishers. The days when a new author would get their chance, sell slowly and build a readership are gone; bad cash flow from book stores and cynicism from critics causes publishing houses to become increasingly wary of taking on new writers unless they’re sure that the books are going to be a blockbuster.

So much time for such a little return can be a daunting thought. Most writers compose for themselves, which really is one of the only ways to balance the thought of never being able to make a living through writing. Authors like Robert Jordan, Stephen King, Robert J. Sawyer and Terry Brooks got lucky – they had the right mix of skill with words and business, the right pace and the right stuff to make themselves best-sellers. They sell millions of copies around the world every year, and make the living of the average minimum-wage fry cook. Can you live this life? Not a lot of people can, whatever their drive or talent. However, even if you only sell ten thousand copies, put out ten books and you have your first million right there. Writing is one of the few professions where the longer you spend directly working and producing, the more copy you sell and the more money you make. Being an author is very much a a step-stone style life, and badly geared for most people who prefer gradually and steadily climbing, rather than shifting lifestyles and achievements in fits and starts.

So what does this have to do with the RIAA? Along with writers, musicians are in a similar predicament. Bands can spend entire years composing and perfecting an album, only to have it flop on the radio and get no sales. Oh, well, most will say, what did we do wrong? Well, the RIAA has made it a personal crusade to make file sharing the fault of every flopped album in North America, whether the music was good or bad. Why isn’t Kelly Osbourne half the star her father Ozzy is? Oh, that’s easy: Napster did it!

This is a very cynical approach to the conundrum, but a rather straight-forward one at the same time. Instead of buying records, teens now download them entirely from the internet. Oh, bad move, technology! Bad computer, bad! You’re to blame for the downfall of music!
Wrong. The vast majority of people download one or two songs and buy the album. Why? Not because the government tells them its wrong and slaps their wrists, but because there are so many horrible copies of songs that people transmit and retransmit like pubic crabs and worts. It’s horrible out there, and everyone’s to blame! Or are they?

Artists get mad because they spend so much time on their art, and people can get it for free. The RIAA gets mad because they can’t make money from artists’ work (the leeches) because people download music for free. People get mad because music should be available for everyone, rich or poor.

You want music, listen to the radio.

Being a writer myself, I find this argument sad and tired. Musicians and writers spend a lot of time on their work, hope against all popular will that their offsprung words and tunes will strike a chord and be liked, and the entire world has to turn it into a battle over who sits at the front of the bus. Enough already!

Do I think that filesharing should be done away with? No, because it like stands as a form of self-expression, albeit a weak one. People download one or two songs and buy the album, or they don’t. If they download the entire album and never buy it, that’s a differant and much more complicated case.

For an example of corollary here: someone downloads an eBook from a fileserver without having bought it. Robert Jordan and Stephen King both put out eBooks recently, with mixed results. Still, people found ways to get around their “greediness” and share the file with everyone. Jordan and King both are professional writers, and therefore spent a good amount of time on these works for little result in and of themselves, and people have the gall to accuse them of being greedy with a supposedly universal medium. I’m sure if King wanted everyone to read his book for free, he’d have it sky-written, a page per day.

Oh, wait, he’d be accused of turning his art form into a media circus. Never mind.

Getting to the point: people got free results from someone else’s long hard labour, and complain when the people want some payback. Bad society, bad! Musicians and authors spend a lot of time and effort making their songs and books, so be generous and buy them if you like it! If you want to preview some music, download a song. Bands like incubus have been innovating, making websites that stream their new albums but cannot be downloaded. This is ingenius and has the good form of being generous without self-effacing. Authors like Jordan and King put ot eBooks, as teasers to get people to buy their new works – the point is the finished novel.

So you have to wait a while to pay ten dollars for the soft cover rather than getting the hardbound – that’s your prerogative. So you have to wait a few weeks or months for the album to come out so you can hear more of it than the first single – that’s tough luck and good marketting. People work hard to put out their works, so don’t knock the effort they make by whining that “music should be free for everyone.” Music and writing may be free expression, as may be what kind of music you listen to or what books you read, but until you start singing and playing instruments or putting pen to paper, stop asking other people to go without eating in order that you can express yourself. Express YOURSELF. Don’t expect someone else to do it for you, without having to give them something in return. That’s just bad form.

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: archive

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71

Categories

  • Announcements
    • Event Notices
  • Blog
  • Communication
  • Content Strategy
  • Marketing Strategy
  • Personal
  • Reviews
  • Social Media
  • Technology

Archive

  • January 2016
  • June 2015
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • July 2008
  • February 2004
  • Copywriting
  • Blog
  • Reading Lists
  • Colophon

© Copyright 2023 Ian M Rountree · All Rights Reserved