Ian M Rountree

Copywriter, Project Manager, Digital Marketing

  • Copywriting
    • Content Marketing
    • SEO
  • About
  • Contact

Manners and Momentum, a Missing Piece of the Success Puzzle

January 12, 2010 by Ian 2 Comments

non exietence on FlickrTom is the best customer service person I know. He cooks and serves at a place in the food court of the mall where I work. He always smiles, always waves when he sees someone he recognizes, and is always immaculately polite. I’ve seen him ask the same five questions to every customer he sees, every time I walk by for the last year. I’ve never heard him use the same phrase twice in a row. A while ago I asked him how that came about and he said he had developed the habit years ago, and couldn’t seem to get rid of it.

It got even more amusing when he came into my store a few days later, and I noticed that his manner was identical in person to the person he portrayed behind the counter at his own business. For most people, this wouldn’t even get a notice; Tom is a polite guy, soft-spoken, always with a small, courteous smile. But I make a business of noticing things about people, and the very preciseness about Tom that makes him a great person is what makes him a great customer service person. It’s not the other way around.

You can argue that people in call centers have the best phone manners. I’d agree, to some degree, because most of the way I approach people over the phone comes from having done market research surveys for a year. It gets into you. Once you stop using the script, your acceptance goes up, so you foster the most real, most human manners you can to be successful. This only works, of course, if you’re the kind of person willing to do the work. People in outbound are good at this. We’ve all had our bad experiences with the intractable fops on inbound service. They are not what this is about.

This is about interpersonal skills. The ability to make real, fast, transparent connections is being downplayed in the new culture, in part because of the automated veil the internet places over our sense of communication (even though the veil is a paper tiger), and in part because we’re changing our habits on the outside to match those we see online. Teenagers are saying “lawl” and “Oh em gee” outloud, rather than learning to take their expressiveness to the net. Instead of learning to engage maturely online, we’re learning to bring digital body language and netiquette out into the rest of our lives. It’s counter productive.

Developing great interpersonal skills isn’t just useful as a human being, it’s useful to you in business. If you want another good example of this, look at the death of Circuit City. One of their many bad moves was to fire the top third earning commissioned salespeople on staff, and bring in lower paid people who didn’t care. When you hire people who can, but for the grace of HR, find another minimum wage job two doors down, you’re not hiring good customer service, you’re hiring a trainable bank of low engagement labourers. The kinds of people actively attracted to these jobs – I’m not talking about people who fall into them en route to better things, I mean the kind that actually want a low intensity job with no life impact – they’re not interested in your business, or in customer experience. And if they are, do what you can to keep them, because they are your greatest asset, and they don’t even realize it.

So few businesses encourage the growth of interpersonal skills it’s frightening. For all the hubub about the new human business, down in the trenches (read as: on the sales floor) many front line customer service reps are still being coached into using inane catch phrases from a booklet and watch their individual statistics with no understanding of why these key point indicators (KPIs, in the right circles) are useful to either the company, to their customers, or to themselves. It’s ludicrous, but we’re convinced it’s the best way.

We, as businesses, think that because our low-earning staff are unwilling to invest in us, that we can get away with not actually investing in them. But we, as businesses, have the trend entirely backwards. We’re doing the same thing those teenagers are. Our inability to demonstrate meaningful investment in the bottom ranks (even calling them the bottom ranks) is what’s creating a lack of loyalty, engagement, and ingenuity in our people. It’s not them, forcing us to streamline. It’s our constant streamlining forcing them to flee in mortal terror from emotional and cultural investment in the business that employs them. They don’t care about us, entirely because we never, ever, demonstrate real care about them.

Back to Tom. People like him stand out because, whether or not he’s the business owner or a front of house clerk, his built in reaction to everything is “Give if your guts.” Tom couldn’t stop asking people if they’d like the combo meal if he tried. He’s made himself aware of exactly the reasons why it’s important to his business, and is aware that determined people won’t be offended by his asking and will say no if they wish to. The real brilliance behind Tom’s attitude is that he refuses to make a judgement of need or want on behalf of another person, choosing instead to ask direct, simple questions, and get every piece of information he needs without allowing room for omission, presenting in such a way that infers neither opinion, threat, or pressure.

Generosity of intention. Economy of information. Aware, detached participation in your experience as a customer.

I’m declaring Tom as one of the new demigods of business. I’m going to try to be more like him. Why don’t we all? I’m sure it would solve a lot of nagging problems.

Photo by mindfulness.

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: aspiration, awareness, business, customer experience, customer service, demigods, economy, generosity, netiquette, participation

Participation > Consumerism

December 4, 2009 by Ian Leave a Comment

Detroit Consumer Stimulus Campaign
photo by Mike Licht

As we move toward an abundance model of business, what will happen to customer service? I’m having a difficult time reconciling this with my own perception of business for a number of reasons.

I have a problem with the idea of consumerism. The idea that I must (culturally speaking) buy and buy and buy, hoarding my acquisitions and building the perfect castle with the best treasure room all working toward some mythical day when I can say “I have collected enough” and retire really doesn’t sit well with me. Primarily because this betterment of self by acquisition seems very tied into limited resource, which means if I’ve got it, someone else is deprived of it.

What will happen to this mindset when abundance takes over? Will there be a glut of acquisition, when budgetary concerns are no longer valid? Or will we level off and become communal (as opposed to communist) beings centred on contribution capital rather than material proof of worth?

Go into a store where you didn’t get your way. Where someone said no, and you pulled the “The Customer Is Always Right” card. Apologize, please, because this behaviour is an indicator of the temper tantrums our new and changing society is going through. This entitlement behaviour seems to stem from the growing pains we, as a culture, are experiencing in the divide between realizing there’s more than we can ever hope to acquire, and moving toward something markedly different.

We want to participate in our brands.

When we get shut down at a store, or when our efforts at contributing to the buy-sell process go unheeded, we get angry. The knee-jerk reaction is “I’m your customer, I’m right on the authority of: What, you’re rejecting my money?” – and this is a dangerous prospect. Part of this may legitimately come from businesses not being set up to react to customer participation. But they’re changing that, slowly and surely.

Are we, as customers, changing our behaviour to meet these innovative businesses in an acceptable middle ground? Or are we just pounding the old line and demanding satisfaction at all costs, even if it means the brands we love can’t keep their lights on because they made us happy?

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: comentary, consumers, participation

Categories

  • Announcements
    • Event Notices
  • Blog
  • Communication
  • Content Strategy
  • Marketing Strategy
  • Personal
  • Reviews
  • Social Media
  • Technology

Archive

  • January 2016
  • June 2015
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • July 2008
  • February 2004
  • Copywriting
  • Blog
  • Reading Lists
  • Colophon

© Copyright 2023 Ian M Rountree · All Rights Reserved