Ian M Rountree

Copywriter, Project Manager, Digital Marketing

  • Copywriting
    • Content Marketing
    • SEO
  • About
  • Contact

Facebook Timelines – First Look

September 27, 2011 by Ian Leave a Comment

From the site that brought you eight different news feeds in six months, comes a wonderful new toy. A profile dedicated not to what you are, but everything you have ever been. Timelines, introduced last week through developer beta, have been getting a lot of press – but what might they actually mean for your profile?

Here’s what my Timeline looks like at the moment:

Facebook Timelines - Ian M Rountree

 

It’s fairly spartan for now – I’ve put in some extra information, but largely, the moment you activate your Timeline, the magic… Doesn’t exist. I’ll admit, for the first few minutes, I didn’t see what the big deal was.

What do Timelines do that Profiles didn’t?

Liam Quinnlan Rhomyk-Rountree was Born, June 14th 2007 | Ian M Rountree - FacebookOne of the biggest features the new profile system enables is called Milestones – you can set one for just about anything. A birth, a marriage, a death – the new system allows you to go back through your life and mark out the things you want to communicate as important to you.

First thing I did? Marked the birth of my son, Liam. Pretty important event in my world.

I’m sure I’ll get around to finding a picture for my own birth in 1982 eventually – but there’s no rush. Milestones aren’t time-sensitive the way status updates are. I can wait until I’ve got access to all the slide shows from the year my family spent in Australia before adding the marker in my profile that says I went there. Next time I travel, I can build a Milestone out of the trip as it happens – and use one of the photos from the trip’s album to do so.

But that’s not all – with the Timelines system, Facebook’s changed how their entire update methodology works.

Facebook Timeline Update Box | Ian M Rountree - FacebookIt’s not listed specifically as a feature, and it’s certainly not obvious, but Facebook seems to be moving away from the pure “timely updates” theory of social networking, toward creating a full life record within their system.

The box you’ll see on your Timeline (and it’s not clear whether this will look similar on your Home screen) does the common Status/Photo/Place combination as usual – but the kinds of milestones you can add seem to suggest a much broader scope to the site.

Sure, we can mention we had a child or got married… But adding a pet? Losing a loved one? Achievements, awards, and health and wellness goals? This isn’t the usual profile-hygiene fare here – it’s a pretty big deal.  When combined with the marked difference in how Facebook is now displaying news on your home feed – thanks to this month’s News Feed revamp – it’s clear the network is putting some thought into the kinds of news people want to read.

The same people who religiously review the Obituaries in their local paper might, for example, might be the kind to mark only Milestones in their family’s Timelines as top news, and train the system only to promote big events.

The people who are most interested in music culture may de-prioritize their friends’ news in favor of a particular set of band and artist pages.

Relentless business people? We know what they’ll mark as important, don’t we?

HA HA BUSINESS!

How Timelines might affect your personal brand.

Facebook has never really been good for a personal brand directly from the profile side of the site. Pages, sure – we can optimize them to work with a marketing strategy… But now? Imagine tailoring your milestones and life events to only highlight your professional life. Conferences, speaking engagements, promotions, job changes – the list is endless. You can build your Timeline to reflect a single aspect of your life, and go for as much completionism as you can stomach.

Again, it’s a case of choose your own level of involvement. I’m sure we’ll see a whack of personal branding guides over the coming weeks from some very opinionated voices.

Has privacy on Facebook changed?

Naturally, the changeover to Timelines – and associated App-level permission changes – is causing some concern over privacy. But, then, every change the social network makes to its system and capabilities seems to have that effect. This time, particularly, there’s some concern over apps gaining permission to automatically share what you’re doing. For example, if you authorize the New York Times as an app, you may find mentions of every page you view on that site in your timeline.

This persistent auto-sharing may not be a big deal for some people, but imagine seeing 75 to 100 updates in your stream, from one avid news reader.

Yeah. Not a privacy concern. But I imagine a lot of people will either get annoyed, or immediately shunt these kinds of updates off their feeds – thus destroying any value for the app-makers. Once again, it’s an opportunity for thoughtless publicity (not a bad thing) to turn into obsessive annoyance (a very bad thing). And only your friends list can determine which you’ll end up receiving.

I’m not concerned about privacy on social networks…

Because that’s not what they’re for. By their very nature, social networks are sharing platforms – you don’t share privacy. That’s not the point. Any assumption going against this grain is fundamentally flawed – so why worry about it?

We’re still not very good at dividing our personal and professional lives, or our online and offline lives, or our family lives and public lives. So rather than being concerned that Facebook and other social networks are “stealing our privacy” we need to get better at self-censoring.  If you don’t feel comfortable sharing something with the world – it may not be a good idea to put it online. While privacy and restricting options do exist, assuming they’re solid is not a good idea.

In the end, it’s all a game of “Choose Your Poison” anyway.

How you present yourself online is closer to your choice of haircut, than it is your choice of friends. There will be bad hair days on your social networks, and times when it’s so fantastic you worry about being narcissistic. Learn to live with that, and you’ll be fine.

We used to think of Facebook as another photo sharing service. Then it was a microblog alongside. Then it became ten thousand other little parts of our lives.

But now…

What do we call Facebook now, I wonder?

Filed Under: Content Strategy, Social Media Tagged With: Facebook, meta, preview, privacy, timelines

Anti-Curating the iPad Launch

January 27, 2010 by Ian 20 Comments

Apple iPad on flickrThe bomb dropped this morning while I was out shopping for groceries. It’s not that I didn’t know apple was hosting an event today, I just didn’t care. With Robert Scoble on the scene to do what he does best and aggregate/contextualize and curate, nothing said of the countless blogs and other media outlets covering it as if it were, in Mitch Joel’s words, the MosesTablet, successor to the JesusPhone.

I’m not really down on the iPad, despite its stupid name, but I had better things to do today than play sheepdog with the rest of the blogging world. Instead, I’m going to tell you what I think of the iPad with only the input of my own gadget sense (Why, Read The Manual! style, that is) and armed only by the information available at Apple’s official page on its site for the iPad.

This is not a preview. This is what I’d tell you if you came to buy this from me when it launched, 60 days from now.

I don’t usually perform exegesis on my presentation style, but now’s a good time for a demonstration, because I think it’s the only fair way I can do this with the information I’ve got.

I asked for some non-news, non-curation related perspective about the iPad on twitter. @StevenHodson replied with “- it’s a nice toy .. nothing much more than that .. it definitely isn’t the savior of old media regardless of the hype.” I agree with that assessment, with a few provisos. I mentioned I expect to see a more than 10% return rate at the store for the iPad when it launches, @ChrisDca replied “Couldn’t agree more. People will take it home, play with it for a week and get bored quickly.” – A fair assessment.

I’ll have to explain first what I think the iPad is for, and what people probably think it’s for. This is always the difference between buying in, and returning a product.

We’re not seeing a reinvention of anything here; we’re seeing what Apple has proven themselves best at, which is a partial conversion between a number of devices. Obviously, the UI is designed with the iPhone and iPod Touch in mind, clearly well beefed up, and geared toward the app store. this is excellent because it’s a familiar platform, by now, and the concept is firmly set in people’s minds. Also, for those of us who are Windows junkies, the iPhone OS means we’re not really adopting Apple’s OS – this may seem trivial, but it’s a big deal. Not having to learn a new operating system accounts for nearly a third of the “don’t really want it” reactions for new computer buyers. We saw this with netbooks – now we have Windows 7 on them.

It’s possible for the iPad to win. Just less likely than the hype presupposes.

What the iPad is going to be great at is – you guessed it – exactly what the devices it emulates are. Like an iPod touch, it’ll have apps. Like a Netbook, it will be for portable internet. Like a Kindle, it will have eBooks, which may be the real killer app on the iPad. We’ll see.

The key here is that you have to actually be able to use the device. It’s not a netbook, and even with the keyboard attachment you can get, using it like a small laptop is a failing idea because there’s no current office app. Microsoft isn’t about to get OfficePod approved, and Google is likely focusing on its web-based If that changes, this application for the device changes.

It’s also not an iPod. As much as the possible top end of 64gb suggests that large amounts of music storage is possible, and matches the current iPod Touch and iPhone top end limits, the device itself is so multipurpose that using it exclusively as a music machine is broken. I ran into this when I bought my iPod Touch 8gb when they first launched. I swiftly had more apps and cache than music, which annoyed me. More memory is good, but people will have to be careful with their acquisition of junk apps. Until Apple works out expandable memory and partitioning, this will be a recurring issue for people less focused on curation of their libraries.

The iPad is also not strictly an eBook reader, though it will be easier to conquer this market than people expect. Where Apple has the real possibility to shine here is academia. Imagining a good iBook app is easy. Imagining the costs of college text books being replaced with the one-time cost of an iPad when you enroll to a high end school, and the further, far less drastic costs of textbooks as you take on courses is a stretch – but a very small one, assuming Apple jumps on the idea. Books are so thoroughly ubiquitous, even in today’s less-than-focused literacy culture, that really crushing the market is a simple prospect. People love to read. What they hate is cumbersome books and costly acquisition and maintainence. The iPad avoids both of these issues just like other eBook readers.

Not too many people will see the possibilities this way.

I’m betting a lot of the buying public will pick up an iPad and, as @ChrisDca’s tweet suggests, get bored within the week. Especially if they’re already exposed to iPod Touch and iPhones. It’s just a bigger screen for the same functions, with some new accessories, which are always a money suck. It’s also rather big for an iPod, which is how many people will see it, which makes jacking in your headphones and slapping this in a pocket a non-option.

It’s not a phone either. Perhaps the 3G model will have Skype, or somesuch, but that’s still not a universal fix. The iPad is not an all-around device. It’s not for gaming either. Much as I can imagine many rounds of Tap Tap Revenge being played, and racing games, and tower defense games on its massive screen being a huge upgrade from the iPhone experience of these games, there’s no inherent Flash support for now, and certainly no way to install non-App store programs. It’s a web productivity tool.

It’s also NOT a computer. Much as Apple hypes the micro-computer aspect of their portable devices, the iPad still runs on the iPhone OS. Local storage is not indicated, there are no USB plugs, card readers built in, or any other kind of file system accesses. This is a closed system running entirely on web access for its functionality.

But there’s potential here. Right? real potential.

Wait. You know what this reminds me of? A closed system, running entirely on the web. Could it be that Apple is going after ChromeOS with their own device? Now that could be an effective battle. Where Android is battling the iPhone in the smartphone market, the iPad seems, on its face, directed very much at the possibility of a web-computer culture.

I can see the productivity here. Bloggers, citizen journalists, any species of web native, will all see the potential here to become a very good access point. Not a toy, an access point to information, to the sites they follow, their own personal magazine daily, hourly, instantly. Both the iPad with its current iteration (because we all know this is only version one) and the promise of ChromeOS tablet and netbook computers foretell the possibilities that cloud-based operation holds. It’s a dream made of pipes, a series of tubes really – wait, that’s someone else’s analogy.

So what’s the bottom line?

No one is getting everything they wanted with this device. Few people are getting what they expected. If I had planned on buying one as it was hyped before the announcement, I would be disappointed with the run down I’ve seen so far, and likely begin to look elsewhere. However, enough people will get what they’re looking for that this will not fail as a product.

A caution, though, to people who have watched Apple’s trajectory in the past and are waiting until version two if the iPad. When not enough people adopt something early, companies like Apple don’t get enough feedback. Which means that version two will never come, or will not be enough improved over version one to merit the wait. If this looks at all like something that will do any version of what you want, go buy one. don’t be afraid to return it, just make sure you use the heck out of it (kindly) in the first week to know whether it really is worth your dollars.

You have 60 days to decide whether or not to camp out. I’m not getting out my sleeping bag, but if I get the opportunity to own one of these, I’m not liable to pass it up either. There’s no jury to be out or in.

I’m predicting a 15% return rate for the early adopters – high, considering between 8% and 10% returns on most consumer electronics.

Photo by d!zzy.

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: anti-curation, ChrisD.ca, high return rate, iBook, iPad, iphone, iPod Touch, JesusPhone, Jobs, mitch joel, MosesTablet, preview, review, Steven Hodson

Categories

  • Announcements
    • Event Notices
  • Blog
  • Communication
  • Content Strategy
  • Marketing Strategy
  • Personal
  • Reviews
  • Social Media
  • Technology

Archive

  • January 2016
  • June 2015
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • July 2008
  • February 2004
  • Copywriting
  • Blog
  • Reading Lists
  • Colophon

© Copyright 2023 Ian M Rountree · All Rights Reserved